CATFISH TUMOR - USA: (MARYLAND) REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
*******************************************************
A ProMED-mail post
<http://www.promedmail.org>
ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases <http://www.isid.org>
Date: Mon 31 Oct 2011
Source: Howntownannapolis.com, The Capital Gazette [edited] <http://www.hometownannapolis.com/news/TOP/2011/10/31-31/Cause-of-catfish-tumors-still-unknown.html>
Cause of catfish tumors still unknown
-------------------------------------
The mystery of why South River catfish are turning up with skin tumors remains just that: a mystery.
A new study found the culprit is not a group of toxins called PAHs [polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons] that often cause tumors in fish.
The cause may be a virus or other contaminant, according to the lead researcher, Fred Pinkney of the US Fish and Wildlife Service's Chesapeake Bay Field Office in Annapolis.
"If you read detective stories, I imagine we're trying to sift through the evidence," Pinkney said. "Sometimes they give it up easily, sometimes you have to work on them."
The tumor-ridden brown bullhead catfish were first documented in the South River in 2004 after they were found during a separate survey involving other fish. More than half of the fish collected then had unsightly tumors growing around their mouths and 20 percent had liver tumors.
Catfish riddled with such tumors in the Chesapeake Bay region had been prevalent in only the heavily contaminated Anacostia River.
A team lead by Pinkney collected more catfish between 2004 and 2008 to assess the problem. One sampling of South River catfish was not enough to declare a serious problem, Pinkney said. In the additional samples from the South River, between 19 percent and 58 percent of fish had tumors, mostly around the mouth. That validated the findings from 2004, when 53 percent of fish had skin tumors.
"We definitely have a problem with the fish. It's consistently high for skin tumors in the South River," Pinkney said. The rate of liver tumors in South River catfish decreased, from 20 percent in the original sample to 0 to 6 percent in the additional samples, indicating that liver tumors are less of a concern.
Fish also were collected in the Severn, Rhode, and Choptank rivers for analysis. The Severn had a wide range of fish with skin tumors (2 percent to 52 percent). A few Rhode River catfish had skin tumors (6
percent) and almost no skin tumors were found in Choptank catfish.
Scientists performed a variety of tests on the fish, including looking at their DNA, to determine the cause of the tumors.
They did not find a correlation between the tumors and the presence of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons [PAHs], chemicals found in gas, oil, coal, car exhaust, and runoff from highways.
They also didn't find a link between the tumors and another group of chemicals called alkylating agents.
Because brown bullhead catfish live and eat at the bottom of rivers, they can be affected by toxins such as PAHs and alkylating agents that latch onto sediment particles.
Pinkney's team's findings will be published in the journal Science of the Total Environment.
Diana Muller, the riverkeeper for the South River Federation, said anglers often find the tumor-laden catfish, especially in the northern reaches of the river near a waterskiing area. She wonders if the tumors could be caused by old landfills that leach contaminants into groundwater.
"We definitely have to do more research as to why. If it's causing cancer in the catfish, what else is it doing?" Muller said.
[Byline: Pamela Wood]
--
Communicated by:
ProMED-mail from HealthMap alerts
<promed@promedmail.org>
[Skin tumors in fish have been found to be caused by viruses and contaminants. Similar incidence of oral/dermal and liver tumors in fish were observed in other chemically contaminated waterways. These tumors have also been reported in other species, such as walleye (_Stizostedion vitreum_), redhorse sucker (_Moxostoma_ sp.), white sucker (_Catostomus commersoni_), and bowfin (_Amia calva_).
Observational studies that cover several rivers comparing the tumor incidence of different contaminant loads will certainly shed some light. See also a report by the US Environmental Protection Agency at <http://epa.gov/glnpo/aoc/presque.html>. - Mod.PMB]
The original article includes a photo of a brown bullhead catfish with a skin tumor.
The state of Maryland and Chesapeake Bay can be seen on the HealthMap/ProMED-mail interactive map at <http://healthmap.org/r/1pAs>. - Sr.Tech.Ed.MJ]
[see also:
Columnaris disease, catfish - USA: (AL) 20110826.2602 2010
----
Undiagnosed die-off, fish - USA (02): (MN) catfish 20100804.2630] .................................................sb/pmb/mj/dk/ll
*##########################################################*
************************************************************
ProMED-mail makes every effort to verify the reports that are posted, but the accuracy and completeness of the
information, and of any statements or opinions based
thereon, are not guaranteed. The reader assumes all risks in
using information posted or archived by ProMED-mail. ISID
and its associated service providers shall not be held responsible for errors or omissions or held liable for any damages incurred as a result of use or reliance upon posted or archived material.
0 comments:
Post a Comment